Jonathan Swift’s Masterpiece of Satirical Writing and Social Commentary

The Setup and Problem

Published in 1729, “A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People From Being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick” (its full title) begins as what appears to be a serious economic essay addressing Ireland’s poverty crisis.

Swift, writing as an anonymous “projector” or social reformer, describes the dire situation in Ireland: streets filled with begging mothers followed by “three, four, or six children, all in rags and importuning every passenger for an alms.” These children, he argues, grow up to become either thieves, soldiers fighting for foreign countries, or emigrate to America—all of which drain Ireland of resources and population.

The author presents himself as a concerned citizen who has spent years contemplating this problem and has arrived at a solution that will benefit everyone involved.

The “Modest” Solution

After establishing the severity of Ireland’s poverty, the narrator reveals his shocking proposal: the poor should sell their one-year-old children as food to the wealthy. He presents this cannibalistic solution with the same calm, rational tone used in legitimate economic treatises of the time.

The author calculates that of Ireland’s 200,000 couples, about 170,000 cannot afford to maintain their children. He proposes that 20,000 children be kept for breeding purposes, while the remaining 100,000 one-year-olds be sold as delicacies to wealthy landlords and gentlemen.

The Economic Analysis

Swift provides detailed economic calculations with mock-scientific precision:

Cost-Benefit Analysis: A child can be maintained for its first year at a cost of two shillings, after which it can be sold for ten shillings—a healthy profit of eight shillings per child.

Market Research: He’s been informed by “a very knowing American” that a young, healthy child makes “a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or broiled.”

Seasonal Considerations: Children will be “in season throughout the year,” though the author notes they’ll be “more plentiful in March” (nine months after the Catholic holiday calendar would have encouraged conception).

Quality Considerations: Children of beggars will actually be superior meat because their mothers’ poor nutrition will make the flesh more tender.

Additional Benefits

The narrator lists numerous advantages his proposal would bring to Irish society:

Economic Benefits:

  • The poor will have something valuable to sell
  • The nation’s stock will increase by £50,000 per year
  • Money will circulate within Ireland rather than going to foreign countries

Social Benefits:

  • Poor tenants will be able to pay their rent
  • Mothers will care better for their children (knowing they represent future income)
  • Men will become as fond of their wives during pregnancy as they are of their pregnant livestock

Culinary Benefits:

  • A new dish will grace the tables of landlords
  • Taverns will compete to prepare the finest children
  • The skin can be made into admirable gloves for ladies and boots for gentlemen

The Reasonable Tone

Throughout this horrifying proposal, Swift maintains the detached, rational tone of genuine economic and social reform literature. The narrator presents himself as purely motivated by public good, claiming he has no personal interest since his own children are too old and his wife past childbearing.

This clinical presentation makes the satire more effective—the horror comes not from emotional language but from the matter-of-fact way cannibalism is discussed as social policy.

The Real Solutions Mentioned

Near the end, Swift briefly mentions actual solutions to Ireland’s problems, but dismisses them as impractical. These include:

  • Taxing absentee landlords
  • Using Irish-made goods instead of foreign imports
  • Rejecting luxury and vanity
  • Learning to love their country
  • Teaching landlords mercy toward their tenants
  • Putting pride, vanity, and idleness aside

The narrator rejects these reasonable solutions because “there is not the least probability that these or any like expedient will ever be seriously put in practice.”

The Historical Context

Irish Oppression: Ireland in 1729 was essentially an English colony. Oppressive laws prevented Irish Catholics from owning land, voting, or participating in most professions. Absentee English landlords extracted wealth while contributing nothing to Irish society.

Economic Exploitation: England’s economic policies deliberately kept Ireland impoverished and dependent. Irish goods were heavily taxed while English products flooded Irish markets.

Actual Conditions: Swift’s descriptions of poverty weren’t exaggerated—Ireland was experiencing genuine famine and desperation. Children did die of starvation while landlords lived in luxury.

The Satirical Targets

English Policy: Swift attacks England’s treatment of Ireland as if the Irish were livestock rather than human beings. His cannibal proposal simply makes this dehumanization literal.

Economic Rationalism: The essay mocks the cold, calculating approach of contemporary economists who reduced human suffering to statistical problems requiring purely mathematical solutions.

Absentee Landlords: The wealthy English landlords who owned Irish land but lived in England, extracting rent while contributing nothing, are portrayed as already consuming the Irish people—Swift’s proposal just makes it literal.

Social Indifference: Swift targets the callous indifference of the wealthy and powerful toward the suffering of the poor.

The Satirical Method

Irony: Every word means its opposite. The “modest” proposal is actually monstrous; the “reasonable” narrator is actually insane; the “beneficial” solution would be catastrophic.

Reductio ad Absurdum: Swift takes the logic of treating people as economic units to its horrifying conclusion, showing where such thinking ultimately leads.

Persona: The anonymous narrator isn’t Swift himself but a character—a well-meaning but morally blind social reformer whose reasonable tone makes his proposal even more disturbing.

The Lasting Impact

Satirical Technique: “A Modest Proposal” became the template for satirical writing, showing how to use irony, persona, and logical structure to expose social evils.

Political Commentary: The essay demonstrates how satire can be more effective than direct criticism in attacking powerful institutions and policies.

Moral Awakening: By shocking readers with his cannibalistic proposal, Swift forced them to confront the reality that existing policies were already consuming Irish lives, just less literally.

Why It Endures

The essay remains powerful because its techniques apply to any situation where economic thinking overrides human compassion. When societies treat people as statistics, resources, or problems to be solved rather than human beings deserving of dignity, Swift’s satirical method remains relevant.

The essay’s genius lies in how it forces readers to see familiar problems from a dramatically different perspective, making the unacceptable suddenly visible through the lens of the absolutely unthinkable.

“A Modest Proposal” stands as perhaps the greatest example of satirical writing in English literature, demonstrating how humor and horror can combine to create devastating social commentary that remains relevant across centuries.

Buy this book
Buy it on Amazon.